Information for Editors
To have a new guideline automatically listed above be sure to label it msc and recommendation.

Risk Assessment Summary

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Detectable

Repairable

Priority

Level

MSC00-CMediumProbableNoNo

P4

L3

MSC01-CMediumProbableNoNo

P4

L3

MSC04-CMediumUnlikelyYesNo

P4

L3

MSC05-CLowUnlikelyYesNo

P2

L3

MSC06-CMediumProbableYesYes

P12

L1

MSC07-CLowUnlikelyNoYes

P2

L3

MSC09-CMediumUnlikelyYesNo

P4

L3

MSC10-CMediumUnlikelyNoNo

P2

L3

MSC11-CLowUnlikelyNoNo

P1

L3

MSC12-CLowUnlikelyNoYes

P2

L3

MSC13-CLowUnlikelyYesYes

P3

L3

MSC14-CLowUnlikelyNoNo

P1

L3

MSC15-CHighLikelyNoNo

P9

L2

MSC17-CMediumLikelyYesYes

P18

L1

MSC18-CMediumProbableNoNo

P4

L3

MSC19-CLowUnlikelyYesNo

P2

L3

MSC20-CMediumProbableYesNo

P8

L2

MSC21-CLowUnlikelyNoNo

P1

L3

MSC22-CLowProbableNoNo

P2

L3

MSC23-CHighProbableNoNo

P6

L3

MSC24-CHighProbableYesNo

P12

L1

MSC25-CMediumProbableNoNo

P4

L3



3 Comments

  1. Just noticed that MSC23-C is not rated. Can this be rated?


    1. I presume you mean to ask why MSC23-C lacks a Risk Assessment section?

      While many recommendations do have Risk Assessments, we only require Risk Assessments in our rules, not our recommendations.

      IMO a risk assessment would not be useful for MSC23-C, as its scope includes any incompatibilities or extensions that a compiler may wish to add to the C language.

  2. Only for completeness: Please add MSC23-C also in table "Risk Assessment Summary" since recommendation is rated.