You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 106 Next »

Because floating-point numbers represent real numbers, it is often mistakenly assumed that they can represent any simple fraction exactly. Floating-point numbers are subject to representational limitations just as integers are, and binary floating-point numbers cannot represent all real numbers exactly, even if they can be represented in a small number of decimal digits.

In addition, because floating-point numbers can represent large values, it is often mistakenly assumed that they can represent all significant digits of those values. To gain a large dynamic range, floating-point numbers maintain a fixed number of precision bits (also called the significand) and an exponent, which limit the number of significant digits they can represent.

Different implementations have different precision limitations, and to keep code portable, floating-point variables must not be used as the loop induction variable. See Goldberg's work for an introduction to this topic [Goldberg 1991].

For the purpose of this rule, a loop counter is an induction variable that is used as an operand of a comparison expression that is used as the controlling expression of a do, while, or for loop. An induction variable is a variable that gets increased or decreased by a fixed amount on every iteration of a loop [Aho 1986]. Furthermore, the change to the variable must occur directly in the loop body (rather than inside a function executed within the loop).

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, a floating-point variable is used as a loop counter. The decimal number 0.1 is a repeating fraction in binary and cannot be exactly represented as a binary floating-point number. Depending on the implementation, the loop may iterate 9 or 10 times.

void func(void) {
  for (float x = 0.1f; x <= 1.0f; x += 0.1f) {
    /* Loop may iterate 9 or 10 times */
  }
}

For example, when compiled with GCC or Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 and executed on an x86 processor, the loop is evaluated only nine times.

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, the loop counter is an integer from which the floating-point value is derived:

#include <stddef.h>
 
void func(void) {
  for (size_t count = 1; count <= 10; ++count) {
    float x = count / 10.0f;
    /* Loop iterates exactly 10 times */
  }
}

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, a floating-point loop counter is incremented by an amount that is too small to change its value given its precision:

void func(void) {
  for (float x = 100000001.0f; x <= 100000010.0f; x += 1.0f) {
    /* Loop may not terminate */
  }
}

On many implementations, this produces an infinite loop.

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, the loop counter is an integer from which the floating-point value is derived. The variable x is assigned a computed value to reduce compounded rounding errors that are present in the noncompliant code example.

void func(void) {
  for (size_t count = 1; count <= 10; ++count) {
    float x = 100000000.0f + (count * 1.0f);
    /* Loop iterates exactly 10 times */
  }
}

Risk Assessment

The use of floating-point variables as loop counters can result in  unexpected behavior .

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

FLP30-C

Low

Probable

Low

P6

L2

Automated Detection

Tool

Version

Checker

Description

Clang3.9cert-flp30-cChecked by clang-tidy
CodeSonar8.1p0LANG.STRUCT.LOOP.FPCFloat-typed loop counter
Compass/ROSE

 

 

 

ECLAIR1.2CC2.FLP30Fully implemented
Klocwork2024.1MISRA.FOR.COND.FLT
MISRA.FOR.COUNTER.FLT
 
LDRA tool suite9.7.1

39 S

Fully implemented

Parasoft C/C++test9.5MISRA-065Fully implemented
Polyspace Bug FinderR2016aMISRA2012-RULE-14_1, MISRA2012-DIR-1_1Fully implemented
PRQA QA-C
Unable to render {include} The included page could not be found.
3340, 3342Partially implemented
SonarQube C/C++ Plugin3.11S2193Fully implemented

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Bibliography

 


  • No labels