SEC04-J. Protect sensitive operations with security manager checks

Sensitive operations must be protected by security manager checks.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example instantiates a Hashtable and defines a removeEntry() method to allow the removal of its entries. This method is considered sensitive, perhaps because the hash table contains sensitive information. However, the method is public and nonfinal, which leaves it exposed to malicious callers.

class SensitiveHash {
  Hashtable<Integer,String> ht = new Hashtable<Integer,String>();

  public void removeEntry(Object key) {
    ht.remove(key);
  }
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution installs a security check to protect entries from being maliciously removed from the Hashtable instance. A SecurityException is thrown if the caller lacks the java.security.SecurityPermission removeKeyPermission.

class SensitiveHash {
  Hashtable<Integer,String> ht = new Hashtable<Integer,String>();

  void removeEntry(Object key) {
    check("removeKeyPermission");
    ht.remove(key);
  }

  private void check(String directive) {
    SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();
    if (sm != null) {
      sm.checkSecurityAccess(directive);
    }
  }
}

The SecurityManager.checkSecurityAccess() method determines whether the action controlled by the particular permission is allowed or not.

Noncompliant Code Example (check*())

This noncompliant code example uses the SecurityManager.checkRead() method to check whether the file schema.dtd can be read from the file system. The check*() methods lack support for fine-grained access control. For example, the check*() methods are inadequate to enforce a policy permitting read access to all files with the dtd extension and forbidding read access to all other files. Code that is not itself part of the JDK must not override the check*() methods because the default implementations of the Java libraries already use these methods to protect sensitive operations.

SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

if (sm != null) {  // check whether file may be read
  sm.checkRead("/local/schema.dtd");
}

Compliant Solution (checkPermission())

Java SE 1.2 added two methods �����€š�š�����‚�š�? checkPermission(Permission perm) and checkPermission(Permission perm, Object context) �����€š�š�����‚�š�? to the SecurityManager class. The motivations for this change included

• eliminating the need to hard-code names of checks in method names.
• encapsulating the complicated algorithms and code for examining the Java runtime in a single checkPermission() method.
• supporting introduction of additional permissions by subclassing the Permission class.

The single argument checkPermission() method uses the context of the currently executing thread environment to perform the checks. If the context has the permissions defined in the local policy file, the check succeeds; otherwise, a SecurityException is thrown.

This compliant solution shows the single argument checkPermission() method that checks to see whether the files in the local directory that have the dtd extension can be read. DTDPermission is a custom permission that enforces this level of access. Even if the java.io.FilePermission is granted to the application with the action read, DTD files are subject to additional access control.

SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

if (sm != null) {  //check whether file can be read or not
  DTDPermission perm = new DTDPermission("/local/",  "readDTD");
  sm.checkPermission(perm);
}

Compliant Solution (Multiple Threads)

Occasionally, the security check code exists in one context (such as a worker thread), while the check must be conducted on a different context, such as another thread. The two-argument checkPermission() method is used in this case. It accepts an AccessControlContext instance as the context argument. The effective permissions are those of the context argument only rather than the intersection of the permissions of the two contexts.

Both the single-and double-argument checkPermission() methods defer to the single-argument java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(Permission perm) method. When invoked directly, this method operates only on the current execution context and, as a result, does not supersede the security manager's two argument version.

A cleaner approach to making a security check from a different context is to take a snapshot of the execution context in which the check must be performed, using the java.security.AccessController.getContext() method that returns an AccessControlContext object. The AccessControlContext class itself defines a checkPermission() method that encapsulates a context instead of accepting the current executing context as an argument. This allows the check to be performed at a later time, as shown in the following example.

// Take the snapshot of the required context, store in acc and pass it to another context
AccessControlContext acc = AccessController.getContext();

// Accept acc in another context and invoke checkPermission() on it
acc.checkPermission(perm);

Risk Assessment

Failure to enforce security checks in code that performs sensitive operations can lead to malicious tampering of sensitive data.

Automated Detection

Identifying sensitive operations requires assistance from the programmer; fully automated identification of sensitive operations is beyond the current state of the art.

Given knowledge of which operations are sensitive, as well as which specific security checks must be enforced for each operation, an automated tool could reasonably enforce the invariant that the sensitive operations are invoked only from contexts where the required security checks have been performed.

Bibliography

      14. Platform Security (SEC)