According to the C Standard, subclause 7.1.3 [ISO/IEC 9899:2011],

Additionally, subclause 7.31 defines many other reserved identifiers for future library directions.

No other identifiers are reserved. (Note that the POSIX standard extends the set of identifiers reserved by the C Standard to include an open-ended set of its own. See section 2.2, "The Compilation Environment," in IEEE Std 1003.1-2008.) The behavior of a program that declares or defines an identifier in a context in which it is reserved, or that defines a reserved identifier as a macro name, is undefined. See also undefined behavior 106  in Annex J of the C Standard.

Noncompliant Code Example (Header Guard)

A common but noncompliant practice is to choose a reserved name for a macro used in a preprocessor conditional guarding against multiple inclusion of a header file. See also PRE06-C. Enclose header files in an inclusion guard. The name may clash with reserved names defined by the implementation of the C standard library in its headers or with reserved names implicitly predefined by the compiler even when no C standard library header is included.

#ifndef _MY_HEADER_H_
#define _MY_HEADER_H_

/* Contents of <my_header.h> */

#endif /* _MY_HEADER_H_ */

Compliant Solution (Header Guard)

This compliant solution avoids using leading underscores in the name of the header guard:

#ifndef MY_HEADER_H
#define MY_HEADER_H

/* Contents of <my_header.h> */

#endif /* MY_HEADER_H */

Noncompliant Code Example (File Scope Objects)

In this noncompliant code example, the names of the file scope objects _max_limit and _limit both begin with an underscore. Because it is static, the declaration of _max_limit might seem to be impervious to clashes with names defined by the implementation. However, because the header <stddef.h> is included to define size_t, a potential for a name clash exists. (Note, however, that a conforming compiler may implicitly declare reserved names regardless of whether any C standard library header is explicitly included.) In addition, because _limit has external linkage, it may clash with a symbol with the same name defined in the language runtime library even if such a symbol is not declared in any header. Consequently, it is unsafe to start the name of any file scope identifier with an underscore even if its linkage limits its visibility to a single translation unit.

#include <stddef.h>

static const size_t _max_limit = 1024;
size_t _limit = 100;

unsigned int getValue(unsigned int count) {
  return count < _limit ? count : _limit;
}

Compliant Solution (File Scope Objects)

In this compliant solution, names of file-scope objects do not begin with an underscore:

#include <stddef.h>

static const size_t max_limit = 1024;
size_t limit = 100;

unsigned int getValue(unsigned int count) {
  return count < limit ? count : limit;
}

Noncompliant Code Example (Reserved Macros)

In this noncompliant code example, because the C standard library header <inttypes.h> is specified to include <stdint.h>, the name MAX_SIZE conflicts with a standard macro of the same name, used to denote the upper limit of size_t. In addition, although the name INTFAST16_LIMIT_MAX is not defined by the C standard library, it is a reserved identifier because it begins with the INT prefix and ends with the _MAX suffix. (See subclause 7.31.10 of the C Standard [ISO/IEC 9899:2011].)

#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>

static const int_fast16_t INTFAST16_LIMIT_MAX = 12000;

void print_fast16(int_fast16_t val) {
  enum { MAX_SIZE = 80 };
  char buf[MAX_SIZE];
  if (INTFAST16_LIMIT_MAX < val) {
    sprintf(buf, "The value is too large");
  } else {
    snprintf(buf, MAX_SIZE, "The value is %" PRIdFAST16, val);
  }
}

Compliant Solution (Reserved Macros)

This compliant solution avoids redefining reserved names or using reserved prefixes and suffixes:

#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>
 
static const int_fast16_t MY_INTFAST16_UPPER_LIMIT = 12000;

void print_fast16(int_fast16_t val) {
  enum { BUFSIZE = 80 };
  char buf[BUFSIZE];
  if (MY_INTFAST16_UPPER_LIMIT < val) {
    sprintf(buf, "The value is too large");
  } else {
    snprintf(buf, BUFSIZE, "The value is %" PRIdFAST16, val);
  }
}

Noncompliant Code Example (Identifiers with External Linkage)

In addition to symbols defined as functions in each C standard library header, identifiers with external linkage include, among others, errno and math_errhandling, regardless of whether any of them are masked by a macro of the same name.

This noncompliant example provides definitions for the C standard library functions malloc() and free(). Although this practice is permitted by many traditional implementations of UNIX (e.g., the Dmalloc library), it is disallowed by the C Standard because it is undefined behavior. Even on systems that allow replacing malloc(), doing so without also replacing calloc() and realloc() is likely to cause problems.

#include <stddef.h>
 
void *malloc(size_t nbytes) {
  void *ptr;
  /* Allocate storage from own pool and set ptr */
  return ptr;
}

void free(void *ptr) {
  /* Return storage to own pool */
}

Compliant Solution (Identifiers with External Linkage)

The compliant, portable solution avoids redefining any C standard library identifiers with external linkage. In addition, it provides definitions for all memory allocation functions:

#include <stddef.h>

void *my_malloc(size_t nbytes) {
  void *ptr;
  /* Allocate storage from own pool and set ptr */
  return ptr;
}

void *my_calloc(size_t nelems, size_t elsize) {
  void *ptr;
  /* Allocate storage from own pool and set ptr */
  return ptr;
}

void *my_realloc(void *ptr, size_t nbytes) {
  /* Reallocate storage from own pool and set ptr */
  return ptr;
}

void my_free(void *ptr) {
  /* Return storage to own pool */
}

Noncompliant Code Example (errno)

The behavior of a program is undefined  when

a macro definition of errno is suppressed in order to access an actual object, or the program defines an identifier with the name errno. [ISO/IEC 9899:2011]

(See subclause 7.5 paragraph 2, and undefined behavior 114 in Annex J of the C Standard.)

The errno identifier expands to a modifiable lvalue that has type int but is not necessarily the identifier of an object. It might expand to a modifiable lvalue resulting from a function call, such as *errno(). It is unspecified whether errno is a macro or an identifier declared with external linkage. If a macro definition is suppressed to access an actual object, or if a program defines an identifier with the name errno, the behavior is undefined.

Legacy code is apt to include an incorrect declaration, such as the following:

extern int errno;

Compliant Solution (errno)

The correct way to declare errno is to include the header <errno.h>:

#include <errno.h>

Implementations conforming to C are required to declare errno in <errno.h>, although some historic implementations failed to do so.

Exceptions

DCL37-EX1: It is permissible to use reserved words in declarations when the risk of clashing with a preexisting variable is greater than the risk of clashing with a reserved word. In particular, the scope must be used in a macro that may be invoked with arbitrary preexisting variables (possibly as arguments). The following code demonstrates a SWAP_UNSAFE() macro that exchanges two values, and uses a __tmp variable as a temporary value. This code is permitted because the temporary variable is more likely to clash with a nonreserved variable in the current scope than with a reserved word. This code should be considered nonportable because it requires the current platform to allow the use of __tmp.

#define SWAP_UNSAFE(type, a, b) {type __tmp = a; a = b; b = __tmp;}

Such macros should be used only with great care. See PRE31-C. Avoid side effects in arguments to unsafe macros and PRE00-C. Prefer inline or static functions to function-like macros for more information.

DCL37-EX2: Provided that a library function can be declared without reference to any type defined in a header, it is permissible to declare that function without including its header as long as that declaration is compatible with the standard declaration.

/* Not including stdlib.h */
void free(void *);
 
void func(void *ptr) {
  free(ptr);
}

Such code is compliant because the declaration matches what stdlib.h would provide and does not redefine the reserved identifier. It would not be acceptable to provide a definition for the free() function in the preceding example.

Risk Assessment

Using reserved identifiers can lead to incorrect program operation.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

DCL37-C

Low

Unlikely

Low

P3

L3

Automated Detection

Tool

Version

Checker

Description

Compass/ROSE

 

 

 

ECLAIRCC2.DCL37Fully implemented

LDRA tool suite

 

 

Related Guidelines

CERT C Secure Coding StandardPRE00-C. Prefer inline or static functions to function-like macros
PRE06-C. Enclose header files in an inclusion guard
PRE31-C. Avoid side effects in arguments to unsafe macros
CERT C++ Secure Coding StandardDCL32-CPP. Do not declare or define a reserved identifier
ISO/IEC TS 17961Using identifiers that are reserved for the implementation [resident]

Bibliography

[IEEE Std 1003.1-2008]Section 2.2, "The Compilation Environment"
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011]Subclause 7.1.3, "Reserved Identifiers"
Subclause 7.31.10, "Integer Types <stdint.h>"