Macros are often used to execute a sequence of multiple statements as a group.

While inline functions are, in general, more suitable for this task (see PRE00-C. Prefer inline or static functions to function-like macros), occasionally they are not feasible (when macros are expected to operate on variables of different types, for example).

When multiple statements are used in a macro, they should be bound together in a do-while loop syntactically, so the macro can appear safely inside if clauses or other places that expect a single statement or a statement block.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example contains multiple, unbound statements.

/*
 * Swaps two values.
 * Requires tmp variable to be defined.
 */
#define SWAP(x, y) \
  tmp = x; \
  x = y; \
  y = tmp

This macro will expand correctly in a normal sequence of statements, but not as the then-clause in an if statement:

int x, y, z, tmp;
if (z == 0)
  SWAP( x, y);

This will expand to

int x, y, z, tmp;
if (z == 0)
  tmp = x;
x = y;
y = tmp;

which is certainly not what the programmer intended.

Compliant Solution

Wrapping the macro inside a do-while loop mitigates the problem.

/*
 * Swaps two values.
 * Requires tmp variable to be defined.
 */
#define SWAP(x, y) \
  do { \
    tmp = x; \
    x = y; \
    y = tmp; } \
  while (0)

The do-while loop will always be executed exactly once.

Risk Assessment

Improperly wrapped statement macros can result in unexpected and difficult to diagnose behavior.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Other Languages

This rule appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as PRE10-CPP. Wrap multi-statement macros in a do-while loop.

References

\[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772|AA. C References#ISO/IEC PDTR 24772]\] "NMP Pre-processor Directions"

PRE09-C. Do not replace secure functions with less secure functions      01. Preprocessor (PRE)      PRE11-C. Do not conclude a single statement macro definition with a semicolon