Macro replacement lists should be parenthesized to protect any lower precedence operators from the surrounding expression. See also PRE00-A. Prefer inline functions to macros and PRE01-A. Use parentheses within macros around parameter names.
This CUBE() macro definition is non-compliant because it fails to parenthesize the replacement list.
| #define CUBE(X) (X) * (X) * (X) int i = 3; int a = 81 / CUBE(i); | 
As a result, the invocation
| int a = 81 / CUBE(i); | 
expands to
| int a = 81 / i * i * i; | 
which evaluates as
| int a = ((81 / i) * i) * i); /* evaluates to 243 */ | 
which is not the desired behavior.
With its replacement list parenthesized, the CUBE() macro expands correctly for this type of invocation.
| #define CUBE(X) ((X) * (X) * (X)) int i = 3; int a = 81 / CUBE(i); | 
In this non-compliant coding example, EOF is defined as -1.  The macro replacement list consists of a unary negation operator '-' followed by an integer literal '1'.
| 
#define EOF -1
/* ... */
if (getchar() EOF) {
   /* ... */
}
 | 
In this example, the programmer has mistakenly omitted the comparison operator (see MSC02-A. Avoid errors of omission) from the conditional statement, which should be getchar() != EOF. After macro expansion, the conditional expression is incorrectly evaluated as a binary operation: getchar()-1. This is syntactically correct, even though it is certainly not what the programmer intended.
Parenthesizing the -1 in the declaration of EOF ensures that the macro expansion is evaluated correctly.
| #define EOF (-1) | 
Once this modification is made, the non-compliant code example no longer compiles because the macro expansion results in the conditional expression getchar() (-1), which is no longer syntactically valid.
The following compliant solution uses parentheses around the macro replacement list and adds the (previously omitted) comparison operator.
| 
#define EOF (-1)
/* ... */
if (getchar() != EOF) {
   /* ... */
}
 | 
Note that there must be a space after EOF because otherwise it becomes a function-like macro (and one that is incorrectly formed, since -1 cannot be a formal parameter).
PRE02-EX1. A macro that expands to a single identifier or function call is not affected by the precedence of any operators in the surrounding expression, so its replacement list need not be parenthesized.
| #define MY_PID getpid() | 
Failing to parenthesize macro replacement lists can cause unexpected results.
| Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE02-A | 1 (low) | 1 (unlikely) | 3 (low) | P3 | L3 | 
The LDRA tool suite V 7.6.0 is able to detect violations of this recommendation.
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
| \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.10, "Preprocessing directives," and Section 5.1.1, "Translation environment" \[[Plum 85|AA. C References#Plum 85]\] Rule 1-1 \[[Summit 05|AA. C References#Summit 05]\] Question 10.1 | 
PRE01-A. Use parentheses within macros around parameter names 01. Preprocessor (PRE) PRE03-A. Prefer typedefs to defines for encoding types