Several well-known adages in object-oriented design suggest that the dependency structure of a package or module must never contain cycles; that is, it must be representable as a directed acyclic graph (DAG).

Eliminating cycles between packages has several advantages:

• Testing and maintainability. Cyclic dependencies magnify the repercussions of changes or patches to source code. Reducing the repercussions of changes eases testing and improves maintainability. Inability to perform adequate testing because of cyclic dependencies is a frequent source of security vulnerabilities.
• Reusability. Cyclic dependencies between packages require that the packages be released and upgraded in lockstep. This requirement reduces reusability.
• Releases and builds. Avoiding cycles also helps to steer the development toward an environment that fosters modularization.
• Deployment. Avoiding cyclic dependencies between packages reduces coupling between packages. Reduced coupling reduces the frequency of runtime errors such as ClassNotFoundError. This, in turn, simplifies deployment.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example contains packages named Account and User that consist of the classes AccountHolder and UserDetails respectively. The class UserDetails extends from AccountHolder because a user is a kind of account holder. The class AccountHolder depends on a few nonstatic utility methods defined in UserDetails and must declare and use its instance. Likewise, the UserDetails depends on AccountHolder but instead chooses to extend from it.

 Methods in AccountHolder are designed for inheritance and should not be final 

package Account;
import User.*;
public class AccountHolder {
  private UserDetails ud;  // Uses a class defined in package User

  synchronized void depositFunds(String username, double amount) {
    // Use a utility method of UserDetails to check whether username exists
    if (ud.exists(username)) { 
      // Deposit the amount
    } 
  }

  protected double getBalance(String accountNumber) { 
    // return the account balance 
    return 1.0; 
  }
}

package User;
import Account.*;
public class UserDetails extends AccountHolder {
  public synchronized double getUserBalance(String accountNumber) {
    // Use a method of AccountHolder to get the account balance 
    return getBalance(accountNumber); 
  }

  public boolean exists(String username) { 
    // Check whether user exists 
    return true; // Exists
  }
}

Compliant Solution

The tight coupling between the classes in the two packages can be weakened by introducing an interface called BankApplication in a third package, Bank. The cyclic dependency is eliminated by ensuring that the AccountHolder does not use an instance of UserDetails but instead relies on the interface by importing the Bank package (and not by implementing the interface).

In this compliant solution, such functionality is achieved by adding a parameter of the interface type BankApplication to the depositFunds() method. This solution gives the AccountHolder a solid contract to bank on. Additionally, UserDetails implements the interface and provides concrete implementations of the methods while at the same time inheriting the other methods from AccountHolder.

package Bank;
public interface BankApplication {   
  void depositFunds(BankApplication ba, String username, double amount);
  double getBalance(String accountNumber);
  double getUserBalance(String accountNumber);
  boolean exists(String username); 
}

package Account;
import Bank.*;  // Import from a third package
class AccountHolder  {	  
  public synchronized void depositFunds(BankApplication ba, String username, double amount) {	
    // Use a utility method of UserDetails to check whether username exists
    if (ba.exists(username)) { 
      // Deposit the amount
    } 
  } 
  public double getBalance(String accountNumber) { 
    // Return the account balance 
    return 1.0; 
  }   
}

package User;
import Account.*; // One way dependency
import Bank.*;    // Import from a third package
public class UserDetails extends AccountHolder implements BankApplication {
  public synchronized double getUserBalance(String accountNumber) {
    // Use a method of AccountHolder to get the account balance 
    return getBalance(accountNumber); 
  }
  public boolean exists(String username) { 
    // Check whether user exists
    return true; 
  }
} 

package Implementer;
import Bank.*;
import Account.*;
import User.*;
class BankOperations {
  private BankApplication ba;
  public BankOperations(BankApplication ba) {
    this.ba = ba;
  }

  public void doUserActions() {
    System.out.println(ba.exists("user"));
    System.out.println(ba.getUserBalance("1111"));
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    AccountHolder ac = new AccountHolder(); 
    ac.depositFunds(new UserDetails(), "user", 1.0); // Pass an interface argument
    BankOperations bo = new BankOperations(new UserDetails()); 
    bo.doUserActions(); 
  }
} 

The interface BankApplication appears to contain superfluous methods such as depositFunds() and getBalance(). These methods are present so that if the subclass overrides them, the superclass retains the capability of internally invoking the subclass's methods polymorphically (for example, calling ba.getBalance() with an overridden implementation of the method in UserDetails). One consequence of using this implementation is that methods declared in the interface are required to be public in the classes that define them.

Risk Assessment

Cyclic dependencies between packages can result in fragile builds. A security vulnerability in a package can easily percolate to other packages.

Bibliography

DCL12-J. Prevent class initialization cycles      01. Declarations and Initialization (DCL)      DCL55-JG. Minimize the scope of variables