Information for Editors
To have a new guideline automatically listed above be sure to label it msc and recommendation.
Risk Assessment Summary
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Detectable | Repairable | Priority | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC00-C | Medium | Probable | No | No | P4 | L3 |
| MSC01-C | Medium | Probable | No | No | P4 | L3 |
| MSC04-C | Medium | Unlikely | Yes | No | P4 | L3 |
| MSC05-C | Low | Unlikely | Yes | No | P2 | L3 |
| MSC06-C | Medium | Probable | Yes | Yes | P12 | L1 |
| MSC07-C | Low | Unlikely | No | Yes | P2 | L3 |
| MSC09-C | Medium | Unlikely | Yes | No | P4 | L3 |
| MSC10-C | Medium | Unlikely | No | No | P2 | L3 |
| MSC11-C | Low | Unlikely | No | No | P1 | L3 |
| MSC12-C | Low | Unlikely | No | Yes | P2 | L3 |
| MSC13-C | Low | Unlikely | Yes | Yes | P3 | L3 |
| MSC14-C | Low | Unlikely | No | No | P1 | L3 |
| MSC15-C | High | Likely | No | No | P9 | L2 |
| MSC17-C | Medium | Likely | Yes | Yes | P18 | L1 |
| MSC18-C | Medium | Probable | No | No | P4 | L3 |
| MSC19-C | Low | Unlikely | Yes | No | P2 | L3 |
| MSC20-C | Medium | Probable | Yes | No | P8 | L2 |
| MSC21-C | Low | Unlikely | No | No | P1 | L3 |
| MSC22-C | Low | Probable | No | No | P2 | L3 |
| MSC23-C | High | Probable | No | No | P6 | L3 |
| MSC24-C | High | Probable | Yes | No | P12 | L1 |
| MSC25-C | Medium | Probable | No | No | P4 | L3 |
3 Comments
David A.D. Morano
Just noticed that MSC23-C is not rated. Can this be rated?
David Svoboda
I presume you mean to ask why MSC23-C lacks a Risk Assessment section?
While many recommendations do have Risk Assessments, we only require Risk Assessments in our rules, not our recommendations.
IMO a risk assessment would not be useful for MSC23-C, as its scope includes any incompatibilities or extensions that a compiler may wish to add to the C language.
Volker Erben
Only for completeness: Please add MSC23-C also in table "Risk Assessment Summary" since recommendation is rated.