According to The Java Language Specification, §15.8.3, "" [JLS 2015]:this
When used as a primary expression, the keyword
thisdenotes a value that is a reference to the object for which the instance method was invoked (§15.12), or to the object being constructed....The type of
thisis the class or interface type T within which the keywordthisoccurs....At run time, the class of the actual object referred to may be T, if T is a class type, or a class that is a subtype of T.
The this reference is said to have escaped when it is made available beyond its current scope. Following are common ways by which the this reference can escape:
Returning
thisfrom a nonprivate, overridable method that is invoked from the constructor of a class whose object is being constructed (for more information, see MET05-J. Ensure that constructors do not call overridable methods).- Returning
thisfrom a nonprivate method of a mutable class, which allows the caller to manipulate the object's state indirectly. This situation commonly occurs in method-chaining implementations (see VNA04-J. Ensure that calls to chained methods are atomic for more information). - Passing
thisas an argument to an alien method invoked from the constructor of a class whose object is being constructed. - Using inner classes. An inner class implicitly holds a reference to the instance of its outer class unless the inner class is declared static.
- Publishing by assigning
thisto a public static variable from the constructor of a class whose object is being constructed. - Throwing an exception from a constructor. Doing so may cause code to be vulnerable to a finalizer attack (see OBJ11-J. Be wary of letting constructors throw exceptions for more information).
- Passing internal object state to an alien method, which enables the method to retrieve the
thisreference of the internal member object.
This rule describes the potential consequences of allowing the this reference to escape during object construction, including race conditions and improper initialization. For example, declaring a field final ordinarily ensures that all threads see the field in a fully initialized state; however, allowing the this reference to escape during object construction can expose the field to other threads in an uninitialized or partially initialized state. TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects, which describes the guarantees provided by various mechanisms for safe publication, relies on conformance to this rule. Consequently, programs must not allow the this reference to escape during object construction.
In general, it is important to detect cases in which the this reference can leak out beyond the scope of the current context. In particular, public variables and methods should be carefully scrutinized.
Noncompliant Code Example (Publish before Initialization)
This noncompliant code example publishes the this reference before initialization has concluded by storing it in a public static volatile class field. Consequently, other threads can obtain a partially initialized Publisher instance.
final class Publisher {
public static volatile Publisher published;
int num;
Publisher(int number) {
published = this;
// Initialization
this.num = number;
// ...
}
}
If an object's initialization (and consequently, its construction) depends on a security check within the constructor, the security check can be bypassed when an untrusted caller obtains the partially initialized instance (see OBJ11-J. Be wary of letting constructors throw exceptions for more information).
Noncompliant Code Example (Nonvolatile Public Static Field)
This noncompliant code example publishes the this reference in the last statement of the constructor. It remains vulnerable because the published field has public accessibility and the programmer has failed to declare it as volatile.
final class Publisher {
public static Publisher published;
int num;
Publisher(int number) {
// Initialization
this.num = number;
// ...
published = this;
}
}
Because the field is nonvolatile and nonfinal, the statements within the constructor can be reordered by the compiler in such a way that the this reference is published before the initialization statements have executed.
Compliant Solution (Volatile Field and Publish after Initialization)
This compliant solution both declares the published field volatile and reduces its accessibility to package-private so that callers outside the current package scope cannot obtain the this reference.
final class Publisher {
static volatile Publisher published;
int num;
Publisher(int number) {
// Initialization
this.num = number;
// ...
published = this;
}
}
The constructor publishes the this reference after initialization has concluded. However, the caller that instantiates Publisher must ensure that it cannot see the default value of the num field before it is initialized; to do otherwise would violate TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects. Consequently, the field that holds the reference to Publisher might need to be declared volatile in the caller.
Initialization statements may be reordered when the published field is not declared volatile. The Java compiler, however, forbids declaring fields as both volatile and final.
The class Publisher must also be final; otherwise, a subclass can call its constructor and publish the this reference before the subclass's initialization has concluded.
Compliant Solution (Public Static Factory Method)
This compliant solution eliminates the internal member field and provides a newInstance() factory method that creates and returns a Publisher instance:
final class Publisher {
final int num;
private Publisher(int number) {
// Initialization
this.num = number;
}
public static Publisher newInstance(int number) {
Publisher published = new Publisher(number);
return published;
}
}
This approach ensures that threads cannot see an inconsistent Publisher instance. The num field is also declared final, making the class immutable and consequently eliminating the possibility of obtaining a partially initialized object.
Noncompliant Code Example (Handlers)
This noncompliant code example defines the ExceptionReporter interface:
public interface ExceptionReporter {
public void setExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er);
public void report(Throwable exception);
}
This interface is implemented by the DefaultExceptionReporter class, which reports exceptions after filtering out any sensitive information (see ERR00-J. Do not suppress or ignore checked exceptions for more information).
The DefaultExceptionReporter constructor prematurely publishes the this reference before construction of the object has concluded. This occurs in the last statement of the constructor (er.setExceptionReporter(this)), which sets the exception reporter. Because it is the last statement of the constructor, this may be misconstrued as benign.
// Class DefaultExceptionReporter
public class DefaultExceptionReporter implements ExceptionReporter {
public DefaultExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
// Carry out initialization
// Incorrectly publishes the "this" reference
er.setExceptionReporter(this);
}
// Implementation of setExceptionReporter() and report()
}
The MyExceptionReporter class subclasses DefaultExceptionReporter with the intent of adding a logging mechanism that logs critical messages before reporting an exception.
// Class MyExceptionReporter derives from DefaultExceptionReporter
public class MyExceptionReporter extends DefaultExceptionReporter {
private final Logger logger;
public MyExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
super(er); // Calls superclass's constructor
// Obtain the default logger
logger = Logger.getLogger("com.organization.Log");
}
public void report(Throwable t) {
logger.log(Level.FINEST,"Loggable exception occurred", t);
}
}
The MyExceptionReporter constructor invokes the DefaultExceptionReporter superclass's constructor (a mandatory first step), which publishes the exception reporter before the initialization of the subclass has concluded. Note that the subclass initialization consists of obtaining an instance of the default logger. Publishing the exception reporter is equivalent to setting it to receive and handle exceptions from that point on.
Logging will fail when an exception occurs before the call to Logger.getLogger() in the MyExceptionReporter subclass because dereferencing the uninitialized logger field generates a NullPointerException, which could itself be consumed by the reporting mechanism without being logged.
This erroneous behavior results from the race condition between an oncoming exception and the initialization of MyExceptionReporter. If the exception arrives too soon, it will find the MyExceptionReporter object in an inconsistent state. This behavior is especially counterintuitive because logger has been declared final, so observing an uninitialized value would be unexpected.
Premature publication of an event listener causes a similar problem; the listener can receive event notifications before the subclass's initialization has finished.
Compliant Solution
Rather than publishing the this reference from the DefaultExceptionReporter constructor, this compliant solution adds a publishExceptionReporter() method to DefaultExceptionReporter to permit setting the exception reporter. This method can be invoked on a subclass instance after the subclass's initialization has concluded.
public class DefaultExceptionReporter implements ExceptionReporter {
public DefaultExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
// ...
}
// Should be called after subclass's initialization is over
public void publishExceptionReporter() {
setExceptionReporter(this); // Registers this exception reporter
}
// Implementation of setExceptionReporter() and report()
}
The MyExceptionReporter subclass inherits the publishExceptionReporter() method. Callers that instantiate MyExceptionReporter can use the resulting instance to set the exception reporter after initialization is complete.
// Class MyExceptionReporter derives from DefaultExceptionReporter
public class MyExceptionReporter extends DefaultExceptionReporter {
private final Logger logger;
public MyExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
super(er); // Calls superclass's constructor
logger = Logger.getLogger("com.organization.Log");
}
// Implementations of publishExceptionReporter(),
// setExceptionReporter() and report()
// are inherited
}
This approach ensures that the reporter cannot be set before the constructor has fully initialized the subclass and enabled logging.
Noncompliant Code Example (Inner Class)
Inner classes maintain a copy of the this reference of the outer object. Consequently, the this reference could leak outside the scope [Goetz 2002]. This noncompliant code example uses a different implementation of the DefaultExceptionReporter class. The constructor uses an anonymous inner class to publish an exception reporter.
public class DefaultExceptionReporter implements ExceptionReporter {
public DefaultExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
er.setExceptionReporter(new ExceptionReporter() {
public void report(Throwable t) {
// report exception
}
public void setExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
// register ExceptionReporter
}
});
}
// Default implementations of setExceptionReporter() and report()
}
Other threads can see the this reference of the outer class because it is published by the inner class. Furthermore, the issue described in the noncompliant code example for handlers will resurface if the class is subclassed.
Compliant Solution
Use a private constructor and a public static factory method to safely publish the exception reporter from within the constructor [Goetz 2006a]:
public class DefaultExceptionReporter implements ExceptionReporter {
private final ExceptionReporter defaultER;
private DefaultExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter excr) {
defaultER = new ExceptionReporter() {
public void report(Throwable t) {
// Report exception
}
public void setExceptionReporter(ExceptionReporter er) {
// Register ExceptionReporter
}
};
}
public static DefaultExceptionReporter newInstance(
ExceptionReporter excr) {
DefaultExceptionReporter der = new DefaultExceptionReporter(excr);
excr.setExceptionReporter(der.defaultER);
return der;
}
// Default implementations of setExceptionReporter() and report()
}
Because the constructor is private, untrusted code cannot create instances of the class; consequently, the this reference cannot escape. Using a public static factory method to create new instances also protects against untrusted manipulation of internal object state and publication of partially initialized objects (see TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects for additional information).
Noncompliant Code Example (Thread)
This noncompliant code example starts a thread inside the constructor:
final class ThreadStarter implements Runnable {
public ThreadStarter() {
Thread thread = new Thread(this);
thread.start();
}
@Override public void run() {
// ...
}
}
The new thread can access the this reference of the current object [Goetz 2002], [Goetz 2006a]. Notably, the Thread() constructor is alien to the ThreadStarter class.
Compliant Solution (Thread)
This compliant solution creates and starts the thread in a method rather than in the constructor:
final class ThreadStarter implements Runnable {
public void startThread() {
Thread thread = new Thread(this);
thread.start();
}
@Override public void run() {
// ...
}
}
Exceptions
TSM01-J-EX0: It is safe to create a thread in the constructor, provided the thread is not started until after object construction is complete, because a call to start() on a thread happens-before any actions in the started thread [JLS 2015].
Even though this code example creates a thread that references this in the constructor, the thread is started only when its start() method is called from the startThread() method [Goetz 2002], [Goetz 2006a].
final class ThreadStarter implements Runnable {
Thread thread;
public ThreadStarter() {
thread = new Thread(this);
}
public void startThread() {
thread.start();
}
@Override public void run() {
// ...
}
}
TSM01-J-EX1: Use of the ObjectPreserver pattern [Grand 2002] described in TSM02-J. Do not use background threads during class initialization is safe and is permitted.
Risk Assessment
Allowing the this reference to escape can result in improper initialization and runtime exceptions.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Detectable | Repairable | Priority | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSM01-J | Medium | Probable | Yes | No | P8 | L2 |
Automated Detection
| Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parasoft Jtest | 2024.2 | CERT.TSM01.CTRE | Do not let "this" reference escape during construction |
Bibliography
Section 3.2, "Publication and Escape" | |
Chapter 5, "Creational Patterns, Singleton" | |
| [JLS 2015] | §15.8.3, "this" |



23 Comments
David Svoboda
Dhruv Mohindra
DefaultExceptionReporter. But this is different from EXC01-J. Use a class dedicated to reporting exceptions now.thisescapethisbecause no one will be able to do anything using it anyway.Dhruv Mohindra
The partially constructed NCE is a CS for this guideline. If a caller violates CON26 it is not the problem for this guideline.
Dhruv Mohindra
David, the link to OBJ08-J. Avoid using finalizers is not very useful here because untrusted code will not comply with it. The problem is that untrusted code can add a finalizer. We can keep the link but then we should point out that this should not happen inadvertently by trusted code. (The link to OBJ04 is only about untrusted code)
David Svoboda
I think you should xref OBJ08-J whenever you talk about using finalizers, in order to say "don't try this at home". I think it still applies even if you are referring to untrusted code (which doesn't have the same restrictions as the code we expect devs to write.)
I only have two other comments with the rule as it is now:
Dhruv Mohindra
Sorry there was a race condition between updating my comment and you answering. We can keep the xref but we should point out that it is for trusted code and inadvertent escaping of
this.setExceptionReporter()inDefaultExceptionReporternonfinal but it is not required. So after all, people = subclass in this case and they are calling the right method. (ok, I see what you mean, it can be omitted but the text should state clearly what is happening)David Svoboda
I've addressed my own comments in the rule.
David Svoboda
The '(volatile field and publish after initialization)' code technically violates the rule. The code is safe as written, but you can't safely subclass Publisher with a nontrivial constructor. The ThreadStarter class in EX1 has the same problem.
You could fix both code snippets by making the class final.
Dhruv Mohindra
Good point. I've made the class in CS(volatile field and publish after initialization)
final.I am not sure if EX1 needs to be final (though it is better to declare classes not designed for inheritance final anyway). Even if a subclass invoked the superclass's constructor, the this reference does not escape because the thread cannot be started unless the subclass's initialization is over. If the thread calls the superclass method (that starts the thread) from its constructor, then you lose. But, starting threads from constructors with
thisas a runnable argument is already banned by the CS in this guideline.Dhruv Mohindra
The last CS in MSC16-J. Address the shortcomings of the Singleton design pattern starts a thread from a private constructor which appears to be an exception to the last NCE/CS pair in this guideline.
David Svoboda
So it does. Addressed in that rule.
David Svoboda
In EXC01-J, setExceptionReporter() is a static method (that sets a default value), not a member function. (A member function that serves as a wrapper to a static function is an acceptable workaround.)
Robert Seacord
I'm looking at the list in this section and thinking some of this material might be more appropriate for the introduction.
Kazuya Togashi
In the inner class sections, both noncomplient and complient examples, it says filter() method is published. However, the method is not directly exposed but ExceptionReporter.report() is, implementing filter() method call. It makes possible to use filter() method functionality but still it is not published. Correct me if I'm wrong, please.
Dean Sutherland
Good catch.
The object being published is the new DefaultExceptionReporter. This example happens to show a reporter that invokes a filter() method. I've reworded to clarify.
Masaki Kubo
In both Noncompliant Code Example (Inner Class) and its Compliant Solution, it is unknown where the
filter()method is coming from.David Svoboda
It's also irrelevant, so I took filter() out of the inner function. It's not necessary to understand the good / bad parts of the code samples.
James Ahlborn
while the "Compliant Solution (Public Static Factory Method)" is a valid way to safely do complex initialization of a class before it is available to other classes, this example does not showcase any reason to use this solution. this CS would be just as valid without the factory.
David Svoboda
True. The main point is that:
must be executed before:
.
James Ahlborn
must be executed before and in a way which properly publishes this.num to any other threads.
A Bishop
Automated Detection?
Sonar:
none for reference escape, but one for thread start in constructor:
findbugs:SC_START_IN_CTOR
Axel Hauschulte
I have changed the Noncompliant Code Example (Inner Class) and the corresponding Compliant Solution. The original versions performed recursive invocations of the constructor (
DefaultExceptionReporter) causing aStackOverflowError. I have replaced the recursive call to the constructor by an instantiation of an anonymous class implementingExceptionReporter.David Svoboda
Good catch, thanks!