Page History

...

Depending on the fonts used, certain characters appear visually similar or even identical:

Do not define multiple identifiers that vary only with respect to one or more visually similar characters.

Make the initial portions of long identifiers unique for easier recognition . This also helps and to help prevent errors resulting from nonunique identifiers. (See DCL32 DCL23-C. Guarantee that mutually visible identifiers are unique.)

In addition, the larger the scope of an identifier, the more descriptive its name should be. It may be perfectly appropriate to name a loop control variable i, but the same name would likely be confusing if it named a file scope object or a variable local to a function more than a few lines long. See also DCL01-C. Do not reuse variable names in subscopes and DCL19-C. Use as minimal a scope as possible for all variables and functions.

...

DCL02-C implicitly assumes global scope, which can be confused with scope within the same file. Although it may not generate any errors, a possible violation of the rule may occur, as in the following example. Note this example does not violate DCL32 DCL23-C. Guarantee that mutually visible identifiers are unique.

In file foo.h:

int id_O; //* (capitalCapital letter O) */

In file bar.h:

int id_0; //* (numericNumeric letterdigit zero) */

If a file foobar.c includes both foo.h and bar.h, then both id_0 and id_0 come in the same scope, violating this rule.

...

Failing to use visually distinct identifiers can result in referencing the wrong object or function, causing unintended program behavior.

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

...

...

Image Modified Image Modified Image Modified