With one exception, accessing Accessing or modifying shared objects in signal handlers can lead to result in race conditions , opening up security holes.
According to the "Signals and Interrupts" section of the C99 Rationale:
that can leave data in an inconsistent state. The two exceptions (C Standard, 5.1.2.3, paragraph 5) to this rule are the ability to read from and write to lock-free atomic objects and variables of type volatile sig_atomic_t. Accessing any other type of object from a signal handler is undefined behavior. (See undefined behavior 131.)
The need for the volatile keyword is described in DCL22-C. Use volatile for data that cannot be cached.
The type sig_atomic_t is the integer type of an object that can be accessed as an atomic entity even in the presence of asynchronous interrupts. The type of sig_atomic_t is implementation-defined, though it provides some guarantees. Integer values ranging from SIG_ATOMIC_MIN through SIG_ATOMIC_MAX, inclusive, may be safely stored to a variable of the type. In addition, when sig_atomic_t is a signed integer type, SIG_ATOMIC_MIN must be no greater than −127 and SIG_ATOMIC_MAX no less than 127. Otherwise, SIG_ATOMIC_MIN must be 0 and SIG_ATOMIC_MAX must be no less than 255. The macros SIG_ATOMIC_MIN and SIG_ATOMIC_MAX are defined in the header <stdint.h>.
According to the C99 Rationale [C99 Rationale 2003], other than calling a limited, prescribed set of library functions,
the The C89 Committee concluded that about the only thing a strictly conforming program can do in a signal handler is to assign a value to a
volatile staticvariable which can be written uninterruptedly and promptly return.
The C99 standard dictates the use of However, this issue was discussed at the April 2008 meeting of ISO/IEC WG14, and it was agreed that there are no known implementations in which it would be an error to read a value from a volatile sig_atomic_t. The type of variable, and the original intent of the committee was that both reading and writing variables of volatile sig_atomic_t is implementation-defined, although there are bounding constraints. Only assign integer values from 0 through 127 to a variable of type sig_atomic_t to be fully portable.
Non-Compliant Code Example
would be strictly conforming.
The signal handler may also call a handful of functions, including abort(). (See SIG30-C. Call only asynchronous-safe functions within signal handlers for more information.)
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, err_msg is updated to reflect indicate that the SIGINT signal that was encountered. Issues will occur if a SIGINT is generated prior to the malloc of err_msg finishingdelivered. The err_msg variable is a character pointer and not a variable of type volatile sig_atomic_t.
| Code Block | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> enum { MAX_MSG_SIZE = 24 }; char *err_msg; void handler(int signum) { signal(signum, handler); strcpy(err_msg, "SIGINT encountered."); } int main(void) { signal(SIGINT, handler); err_msg = (char *)malloc(24MAX_MSG_SIZE); if (err_msg == NULL) { /* handleHandle error condition */ } strcpy(err_msg, "No errors yet."); /* mainMain code loop */ return 0; } |
Compliant Solution
...
(Writing volatile sig_atomic_t)
For maximum portabilityTo be safe, signal handlers should only unconditionally set a flag variable of type volatile sig_atomic_t and return., as in this compliant solution:
| Code Block | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> char *err_msgenum { MAX_MSG_SIZE = 24 }; volatile sig_atomic_t e_flag = 0; void handler(int signum) { signal(signum, handler); e_flag = 1; } int main(void) { char *err_msg = (char *)malloc(MAX_MSG_SIZE); if (err_msg == NULL) { /* Handle error */ } signal(SIGINT, handler); strcpy(err_msg, "No errors yet."); /* Main code loop */ if (e_flag) { strcpy(err_msg, "SIGINT received."); } return 0; } |
Compliant Solution (Lock-Free Atomic Access)
Signal handlers can refer to objects with static or thread storage durations that are lock-free atomic objects, as in this compliant solution:
| Code Block | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdatomic.h> #ifdef __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ #error "Atomics are not supported" #elif ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE == malloc(24); if (err_msg == NULL) { /* handle error condition */ } 0 #error "int is never lock-free" #endif atomic_int e_flag = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0); void handler(int signum) { e_flag = 1; } int main(void) { enum { MAX_MSG_SIZE = 24 }; char err_msg[MAX_MSG_SIZE]; #if ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE == 1 if (!atomic_is_lock_free(&e_flag)) { return EXIT_FAILURE; } #endif if (signal(SIGINT, handler) == SIG_ERR) { return EXIT_FAILURE; } strcpy(err_msg, "No errors yet."); /* mainMain code loop */ if (e_flag) { strcpy(err_msg, "SIGINT received."); } return 0EXIT_SUCCESS; } |
Exceptions
...
SIG31-C-EX1: The C Standard, 7.14.1.1 paragraph 5 [ISO/IEC 9899:2024], makes a special exception for errno when a valid call to the signal() function results in a SIG_ERR return, allowing errno to take an indeterminate value. (See ERR32-C. Do not rely on indeterminate values of errno.)
the signal function with the first argument equal to the signal number corresponding to the signal that caused the invocation of the handler.
...
Furthermore, if such a call to the signal function results in a SIG_ERR return, the object designated by errno has an indeterminate representation.
Risk Assessment
Accessing or modifying shared objects in signal handlers can result in accessing data in an inconsistent state. Michal Zalewski's paper "Delivering Signals for Fun and Profit" [Zalewski 2001] provides some examples of vulnerabilities that can result from violating this and other signal-handling rules
Risk Assessment
Depending on the code, this could lead to any number of attacks, many of which could give root access. For an overview of some software vulnerabilities, see \[[Zalewski 06|AA. C References#Zalewski 06]\].Wiki Markup
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Detectable |
|---|
Repairable | Priority | Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIG31-C | High | Likely | Yes | No | P18 | L1 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astrée |
| signal-handler-shared-access | Partially checked | ||||||
| Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-SIG31 | |||||||
| CodeSonar |
| CONCURRENCY.DATARACE | Data race | ||||||
| Compass/ROSE | Can detect violations of this rule for single-file programs | ||||||||
| Cppcheck Premium | 24.9.0 | premium-cert-sig31-c | |||||||
| Helix QAC |
| C2029, C2030 C |
3 (high)
3 (likely)
1 (high)
P9
++3854, C++3855 | |||||||||
| LDRA tool suite |
| 87 D | Fully implemented | ||||||
| Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-SIG31-a | Properly define signal handlers | ||||||
| PC-lint Plus |
| 2765 | Fully supported | ||||||
| CERT C: Rule SIG31-C | Checks for shared data access within signal handler (rule partially covered) | |||||||
| RuleChecker |
| signal-handler-shared-access | Partially checked |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Mitigation Strategies
Static Analysis
Compliance with this rule can be checked using structural static analysis checkers using the following algorithm:
- Traverse the abstract syntax tree (AST) to identify function calls to the signal function
signal(int, void (*f)(int)). - At each function call to
signal(int, void (*f)(int))get the second argument from the argument list. To make sure that this is not an overloaded function the function type signature is evaluated and/or the location of the declaration of the function is verified to be from the correct file (because this is not a link-time analysis it is not possible to test the library implementation). Any definition forsignal()in the application is suspicious, because it should be in a library. - Perform a nested query to identify all referenced objects with static storage duration. Verify that none of these objects are referenced as an rvalue, and that for each object referenced as an lvalue, the underlying type is
sig_atomic_t. - Report any violations detected.
References
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC TS 17961:2013 | Accessing shared objects in signal handlers [accsig] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
| CWE 2.11 | CWE-662, Improper Synchronization | 2017-07-10: CERT: Rule subset of CWE |
| CWE 2.11 | CWE-828, Signal Handler with Functionality that is not Asynchronous-Safe | 2017-10-30:MITRE:Unspecified Relationship 2018-10-19:CERT:Rule subset of CWE |
CERT-CWE Mapping Notes
Key here for mapping notes
CWE-662 and SIG31-C
CWE-662 = Union( SIG31-C, list) where list =
- Improper synchronization of shared objects between threads
- Improper synchronization of files between programs (enabling TOCTOU race conditions
CWE-828 and SIG31-C
CWE-828 = SIG31-C + non-async-safe things besides shared objects.
Bibliography
| [C99 Rationale 2003] | 5.2.3, "Signals and Interrupts" |
| [ISO/IEC 9899:2024] | Subclause 7.14.1.1, "The signal Function" |
| [Zalewski 2001] |
...
\[[Dowd 06|AA. C References#Dowd 06]\] Chapter 13, Synchronization and State
\[[ISO/IEC 03|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 03]\] "Signals and Interrupts"
\[[Open Group 04|AA. C References#Open Group 04]\] [longjmp|http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/longjmp.html]
\[OpenBSD\] [{{signal()}} Man Page|http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=signal]
\[Zalewski\] [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/signals.txt]Wiki Markup