An object that has volatile-qualified type may be modified in ways unknown to the [implementation|BB. Definitions#implementation] or have other unknown side effects. It is possible to reference a volatile object by using a non-volatile value, but the resulting behavior is [undefined|BB. Definitions#undefined behavior]. According to C99 \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.7.3, "Type qualifiers," Paragraph 5:Referencing a volatile object by using a non-volatile lvalue is undefined behavior. The C Standard, 6.7.4 paragraph 7 [ISO/IEC 9899:2024], statesWiki Markup
If an attempt is made to refer to an object defined with a volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified type, the behavior is undefined.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, a volatile object is accessed through a non-volatile-qualified reference, resulting in undefined behavior 62:
| Code Block | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; /* May produce a warning diagnostic */ ipp = (int**) &ip; /* Constraint violation; may produce a warning diagnostic */ *ipp = &i; /* Valid */ if (*ip != 0) { /* Valid */ /* . |
...
.. */
}
} |
The assignment ipp = &ip is not safe because it allows the valid code that follows to reference the value of the volatile object i through the non-volatile-qualified reference ip. In this example, the compiler may optimize out the entire if block because *ip != 0 must be false if the object to which ip points is not volatile.
Implementation Details
This example compiles without warning on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 when compiled in C mode (/TC) but causes errors when compiled in C++ mode (/TP).
GCC 4.8.1 generates a warning but compiles successfully.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, ip is declared volatile:
| Code Block | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h>
void func(void) {
static volatile int **ipp;
static volatile int *ip;
static volatile int i = 0;
printf("i = %d.\n", i);
ipp = &ip;
*ipp = &i;
if (*ip != 0) {
/* ... */
}
} |
Risk Assessment
Accessing an object with a volatile-qualified type through a reference with a non-volatile-qualified type is undefined behavior 62
This also applies to objects that behave as if they were defined with qualified types, such as an object at a memory-mapped input/output address.
...
Risk Assessment
Accessing a volatile object through a non-volatile reference can result in undefined and perhaps unintended program behavior.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood |
|---|
Remediation Cost
Priority
Level
EXP32-C
1 (low)
3 (likely)
2 (medium)
P6
Detectable | Repairable | Priority | Level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP32-C | Low | Likely | No | Yes | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astrée |
| pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 | ||||||
| Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-EXP32 | Fully implemented | ||||||
| Clang |
| -Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers | |||||||
| Compass/ROSE | |||||||||
| Coverity |
| MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 | Implemented | ||||||
| Cppcheck Premium |
| premium-cert-exp32-c | |||||||
| GCC |
| Can detect violations of this rule when the | |||||||
| Helix QAC |
| C0312, C0562, C0563, C0673, C0674 | Fully implemented | ||||||
| Klocwork |
| CERT.EXPR.VOLATILE.ADDR | Fully implemented | ||||||
| LDRA tool suite |
| 344 S | Partially implemented | ||||||
| Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-EXP32-a | A cast shall not remove any 'const' or 'volatile' qualification from the type of a pointer or reference | ||||||
| Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for cast to pointer that removes const or volatile qualification (rule fully covered) | |||||||
| RuleChecker |
| pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
\[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.7.3, "Type qualifiers," and Section 6.5.16.1, "Simple assignment"
\[[MISRA 04|AA. C References#MISRA 04]\] Rule 11.5 |
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Pointer Casting and Pointer Type Changes [HFC] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
| ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Type System [IHN] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
| MISRA C:2012 | Rule 11.8 (required) | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
| CERT C | EXP55-CPP. Do not access a cv-qualified object through a cv-unqualified type | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
Bibliography
| [ISO/IEC 9899:2024] | 6.7.4, "Type Qualifiers" |
...
EXP31-C. Do not modify constant values 03. Expressions (EXP) EXP33-C. Do not reference uninitialized variables