
Related functions, such as those that make up a library, should provide consistent and usable interfaces. Ralph Waldo Emerson might have said, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds," but inconsistencies in functional interfaces or behavior can lead to erroneous use, so we understand this to be a "wise consistency." . One aspect of providing a consistent interface is to provide a consistent and usable error-checking mechanism. For more information, see API04-C. Provide a consistent and usable error-checking mechanism.
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Interface)
It is not necessary to go beyond the standard C library to find examples of inconsistent interfaces. This is because : the standard library is a fusion of multiple different libraries with various styles and various levels of rigor. For example, the fputs()
defined in §7.19the C Standard, subclause 7.21.7.4, is closely related to the fprintf()
defined in §7subclause 7.1921.6.1. However, the fputs()
has the 's file handle is at the end, and fprintf()
at 's is at the beginning, as shown by their function declarations.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
int fputs(const char * restrict s, FILE * restrict stream);
int fprintf(FILE * restrict stream, const char * restrict format, ...);
|
The argument order can be easily rearranged using macros, ; for example:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h>
#define fputs(X,Y) fputs(Y,X)
|
However, according to subclause 7.1.3 of the C Standard, the behavior of a program that defines a symbol, including a macro, with the same name as that of a standard library function, type, macro, or other reserved identifier is undefined.
Using inconsistent interfaces makes , this makes the code difficult to read, for example, by causing confusion when moving between code that follows this convention and code that does not. In effect, it becomes impossible to modify an interface once that interface has been broadly adopted. Consequently, it is important to get the interface design right the first time.
Compliant Solution (
...
Wiki Markup |
---|
The managed string library \[[Burch 06|AA. C References#Burch06]\] tries to be as consistent as possible, both internally, and with established conventions from the C standard library. For example, functions that operate on a single instance of a {{string_m}}, but do modify the contents of the managed string, follow the pattern: |
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
errno_t strlen_m(const string_m s, rsize_t *size);
errno_t isnull_m(const string_m s, _Bool *nullstr);
errno_t cgetstr_m(const string_m s, char **string);
|
Interface)
The POSIX threads library [Butenhof 1997] defines an interface that is both consistent and fits in with established conventions from the rest of the POSIX library. For example, all initialization functions follow the same consistent pattern of the first argument being a pointer to the object to initialize with the subsequent arguments, if any, optionally providing additional attributes for the initialization:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
/* Initialization of pthread attribute objects */
int pthread_condattr_init(pthread_condattr_t *);
int pthread_mutexattr_init(pthread_mutexattr_t *);
int pthread_rwlockattr_init(pthread_rwlockattr_t *);
...
/* Initialization of pthread objects using attributes */
int pthread_cond_init(pthread_cond_t * restrict, const pthread_condattr_t * restrict);
int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t * restrict, const pthread_mutexattr_t * restrict);
int pthread_rwlock_init(pthread_rwlock_t * restrict, const pthread_rwlockattr_t * restrict);
...
|
Function arguments that refer to objects that are not modified are declared const
. Because the object pointed to by the first argument is modified by the function, it is not const
where the first argument is declared as const string_m
. For functions that implement a data abstraction (see , it is reasonable to define the handle for the data abstraction as the initial parameter. (See DCL12-C. Implement abstract data types using opaque types.) Finally, it is reasonable to define the handle for the data abstraction as the initial parameterinitialization functions that accept a pointer to an attribute object allow it to be NULL
as an indication that a reasonable default should be used.
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Behavior)
The shared folder and file copy functions in the VMware virtual infrastructure (VIX) API are inconsistent in the set of characters they allow in folder names. As a result, you can create a shared folder that you subsequently can't subsequently cannot use in a file copy function such as VixVM_CopyFileFromHostToGuest()
.
Compliant Solution (
...
Behavior)
Try to be consistent in the behavior of related functions that perform operations on common objects , so that an object created or modified by one function can be successfully processed by a downstream invocation of a related function.
Risk Assessment
Failure to do so can to maintain consistency in interfaces and capabilities across functions can result in type errors in the program.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Detectable |
---|
Repairable | Priority | Level |
---|
API03-C | Medium |
Unlikely |
No |
No | P2 | L3 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Other Languages
This rule appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as cplusplus:API04-CPP. Provide a consistent and usable error checking mechanism.
References
VMware 07 VIX API Version 1.1.1 (for Workstation 6.0.1) Release Notes. 16-August-2007
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[Burch 06|AA. C References#Burch06]\]
\[[CERT 06c|AA. C References#CERT 06c]\]
\[[ISO/IEC 9945:2003|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9945-2003]\]
\[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 7.21, "String handling <{{string.h}}>"
\[[ISO/IEC 23360-1:2006|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 23360-1-2006]\]
\[[ISO/IEC TR 24731-1:2007|AA. C References#ISO/IEC TR 24731-1-2007]\]
\[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24731-2|AA. C References#ISO/IEC PDTR 24731-2-2007]\]
\[[Miller 99|AA. C References#Miller 99]\]
\[[MISRA 04|AA. C References#MISRA 04]\] Rule 20.4
\[[Seacord 05a|AA. C References#Seacord 05a]\] Chapter 2, "Strings" |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
---|---|---|
ISO/IEC 9945:2003 | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship | |
ISO/IEC 23360-1:2006 | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship | |
ISO/IEC TR 24731-2 | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship | |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 21.3 (required) | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
MISRA C:2012 | Directive 4.12 (required) | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
Bibliography
[Burch 2006] | |
[CERT 2006c] | |
[Miller 1999] | |
[Seacord 2013] | Chapter 2, "Strings" |
[VMware 2007] | VIX API Version 1.1.1 (for Workstation 6.0.1) Release Notes |
...
APP00-C. Functions should validate their parameters 13. Application Programming Interfaces (API) API04-C. Provide a consistent and usable error checking mechanism