According to the Java Language Specification \[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\], Section 8.4.8.3, "Requirements in Overriding and Hiding" Increasing the accessibility of overridden or hidden methods permits a malicious subclass to offer wider access to the restricted method than was originally intended. Consequently, programs must override methods only when necessary and must declare methods final whenever possible to prevent malicious subclassing. When methods cannot be declared final, programs must refrain from increasing the accessibility of overridden methods.Wiki Markup
The access modifier of an overriding or hiding method must provide at least as much access as the overridden or hidden method
...
(The Java Language Specification, §8.4.8.3, "Requirements in Overriding and Hiding" [JLS 2015]). The following table lists the allowed accesses.
Overridden/Hidden Method Modifier | Overriding/Hiding Method Modifier |
|---|
The following are the allowed accesses:
Overridden/hidden method modifier
|
|
|
|
default | default or |
| Cannot be overridden |
This permits a malicious subclass to offer wider access to the restricted method than was originally intended.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example exemplifies demonstrates how a malicious subclass Sub can both override the doLogic() method of the superclass and increase the accessibility of the overriding method. Any user of Sub will be able to can invoke the doLogic method as because the base class BadScope Super defines it with the protected access modifier. The class Sub can allow more access than BadScope to be protected, consequently allowing class Sub to increase the accessibility of doLogic() by declaring its own version of the doLogic() method {{public}method to be public.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
class BadScopeSuper { protected void doLogic() { System.out.println("Super invoked"); } } public class Sub extends BadScopeSuper { public void doLogic() { System.out.println("Sub invoked"); // Do sensitive operations } } |
Compliant Solution
Override methods only when necessary. Declare methods and fields final whenever possible to avoid malicious subclassing. When methods and fields cannot be declared final, refrain from increasing the accessibility of overridden methods. (See guideline SEC01-J. Minimize the accessibility of classes and their members.)This compliant solution declares the doLogic() method final to prevent malicious overriding:
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
class BadScopeSuper { protected final void doLogic() { // declareDeclare as final System.out.println("Super invoked"); // Do sensitive operations } } |
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example overrides the finalize() method of the superclass Base, changing its accessibility from protected to public.
According to Sun's Secure Coding Guidelines [[SCG 2007]]
In addition, refrain from increasing the accessibility of an inherited method, as doing so may break assumptions made by the superclass. A class that overrides the
protected java.lang.Object.finalizemethod and declares that methodpublic, for example, enables hostile callers to finalize an instance of that class, and to call methods on that instance after it has been finalized. A superclass implementation unprepared to handle such a call sequence could throw runtime exceptions that leak private information, or that leave the object in an invalid state that compromises security.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
final class SubClass extends Base { public void finalize() { // ... } } |
...
This compliant solution correctly declares the finalize() method protected. It is not possible to further limit the accessibility as Object's finalize method itself is declared protected.
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
final class SubClass extends Base {
protected void finalize() {
// ...
}
}
|
It is recommended but not mandatory to limit the accessibility of a subclass's constructor to that of the superclass's constructor.
Exceptions
SPC01-EX1: According to Sun's Secure Coding Guidelines [[SCG 2007]]
...
Exceptions
MET04-J-EX0: For classes that implement the java.lang.Cloneable interface
...
, the accessibility of the Object.clone() method should be increased from protected to public [SCG 2009].
Risk Assessment
Subclassing allows weakening of access restrictions, which can compromise the security of a Java application.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Detectable |
|---|
Repairable | Priority | Level |
|---|
MET04-J | Medium |
Probable |
Yes |
No | P8 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Straightforward.
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.
Detecting violations of this rule is straightforward.
| Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.MET04.OPM | Do not override an instance "private" method |
Related Guidelines
...
...
, Reliance on Package- |
...
Level Scope | |
Guideline 4-1 / EXTEND-1: Limit the accessibility of classes, interfaces, methods, and fields |
Bibliography
...
...
[ |
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
SCP00-J. Use as minimal scope as possible for all variables 05. Scope (SCP) SCP02-J. Do not reuse names