Page History

Variable length arrays (VLA) VLAs), a conditionally supported language feature, are essentially the same as traditional C arrays , the major difference being except that they are declared with a size that is not a constant integer expression . A and can be declared only at block scope or function prototype scope and no linkage. When supported, a variable length array can be declared as follows:

{ /* Block scope */
  char vla[ssize];
}

where the integer expression size and the declaration of vla are both The above statement is evaluated at runtime allocating storage for scharacters in stack memory. If a the size argument supplied to VLAs a variable length array is not a positive integer value of reasonable size, then , the behavior is undefined. (See undefined behavior 75.)  Additionally, if the magnitude of the argument is excessive, the program may behave in an unexpected way. An attacker may be able to leverage this behavior to overwrite critical program data (Feline 1)[Griffiths 2006]. The programmer must ensure that size arguments to VLAs are valid and have not been corrupted as the result of an exceptional integer condition.

Non-Compliant Example

variable length arrays, especially those derived from untrusted data, are in a valid range.

Because variable length arrays are a conditionally supported feature of C11, their use in portable code should be guarded by testing the value of the macro __STDC_NO_VLA__. Implementations that do not support variable length arrays indicate it by setting __STDC_NO_VLA__ to the integer constant 1.

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, a variable length array of size size is declared. The size is declared as size_t in compliance with INT01-C. Use rsize_t or In this example, a VLA of size s is declared. In accordance with Recommendation INT01-A. Use size_t for all integer values representing the size of an object, s is of type size_t as it is used to specify the size of an object. However, it is unclear whether or not the value of s is a valid size argument. Depending on how VLAs are implemented s may be interpreted as a negative value or a very large value. In either case, this may result in a security vulnerability..

#include <stddef.h>

extern void do_work(int *array, size_t size);
 
void func(size_t size) {
  int vla[size];
  do_work(vla, size);
}

However, the value of size may be zero or excessive, potentially giving rise to a security vulnerability.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution ensures the size argument used to allocate vla is in a valid range (between 1 and a programmer-defined maximum); otherwise, it uses an algorithm that relies on dynamic memory allocation. The solution also avoids unsigned integer wrapping that, given a sufficiently large value of size, would cause malloc to allocate insufficient storage for the array.

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
 
enum { MAX_ARRAY = 1024 };
extern void do_work(int *array, size_t size);
 

void func(size_t s size) {
  if (0 == size || SIZE_MAX / sizeof(int) < size) {
    /* Handle error */
    return;
  }
  if (size < MAX_ARRAY) {
    int vla[ssize];
     ...
}
...
func(size);
...

Compliant Solution

Validate size arguments used in VLA declarations. The solution below ensures the size argument, s, supplied to allocate vla is in a valid range: 0 to a user defined constant.

do_work(vla, size);
  } else {
    int *array = (int *)malloc(size * sizeof(int));
    if (array == NULL) {
      /* Handle error */
    }
    do_work(array, size);
    free(array);
  }
}

Noncompliant Code Example (sizeof)

The following noncompliant code example defines A to be a variable length array and then uses the sizeof operator to compute its size at runtime. When the function is called with an argument greater than SIZE_MAX / (N1 * sizeof (int)), the runtime sizeof expression may wrap around, yielding a result that is smaller than the mathematical product N1 * n2 * sizeof (int). The call to malloc(), when successful, will then allocate storage for fewer than n2 elements of the array, causing one or more of the final memset() calls in the for loop to write past the end of that storage.

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
 
enum { N1 = 4096 };

void *

#define MAX_ARRAY 1024

void func(size_t sn2) {
  typedef int vla[sA[n2][N1];

   ...
}
...
if (size < MAX_ARRAY && size != 0) {
   func(size);
} elseA *array = malloc(sizeof(A));
  if (!array) {
    /* Handle error */
    return NULL;
  }

  for (size_t i = 0; i != n2; ++i) {
    memset(array[i], 0, N1 * sizeof(int));
  }

  return array;
}

Furthermore, this code also violates ARR39-C. Do not add or subtract a scaled integer to a pointer, where array is a pointer to the two-dimensional array, where it should really be a pointer to the latter dimension instead. This means that the memset() call does out-of-bounds writes on all of its invocations except the first.

Compliant Solution (sizeof)

This compliant solution prevents sizeof wrapping by detecting the condition before it occurs and avoiding the subsequent computation when the condition is detected. The code also uses an additional typedef to fix the type of array so that memset() never writes past the two-dimensional array.

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
 
enum { N1 = 4096 };

void *func(size_t n2) {
  if (n2 > SIZE_MAX / (N1 * sizeof(int))) {
    /* Prevent sizeof wrapping */
    return NULL;
  }

  typedef int A1[N1];
  typedef A1 A[n2];

  A1 *array = (A1*) malloc(sizeof(A));

  if (!array) {
    /* Handle Errorerror */
    return NULL;
  } 

  for (size_t i = 0; i != n2; ++i) {
    memset(array[i], 0, N1 * sizeof(int));
  }
  return array;
}

Implementation Details

Microsoft

Variable length arrays are not supported by Microsoft compilers.

Risk Assessment

Failure to properly specify the size of a variable length array may allow arbitrary code execution or result in stack exhaustion.

...

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

CERT-CWE Mapping Notes

Key here for mapping notes

CWE-129 and ARR32-C

Intersection( CWE-188, EXP39-C) = Ø

ARR32-C addresses specifying the size of a variable-length array (VLA). CWE-129 addresses invalid array indices, not array sizes.

CWE-758 and ARR32-C

Independent( INT34-C, INT36-C, MSC37-C, FLP32-C, EXP33-C, EXP30-C, ERR34-C, ARR32-C)

CWE-758 = Union( ARR32-C, list) where list =

• Undefined behavior that results from anything other than too large a VLA dimension.

CWE-119 and ARR32-C

• Intersection( CWE-119, ARR32-C) = Ø

• ARR32-C is not about providing a valid buffer but reading/writing outside it. It is about providing an invalid buffer, or one that exhausts the stack.

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image Added

References

Feline 1: http://felinemenace.org/papers/p63-0x0e_Shifting_the_Stack_Pointer.txt