Page History

Sensitive operations must be protected by security manager checks. Refer to guideline ENV02-J. Create a secure sandbox using a Security Manager to learn about the importance of performing security checks and limiting code to a secure sandbox.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example instantiates a Hashtable and defines a removeEntry() method to allow the removal of its entries. This method is considered sensitive, perhaps because the hash table contains sensitive information. However, the method is public and non-finalnonfinal, which leaves it susceptible exposed to malicious callers.

class SensitiveHash {
  private Hashtable<Integer,String> ht = new Hashtable<Integer,String>();

  public void removeEntry(Object key) {
    ht.remove(key);
  }
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution demonstrates how installs a security check can be installed to protect entries from being maliciously removed from the Hashtable instance. A SecurityException is thrown if the caller does not possess lacks the java.security.SecurityPermission removeKeyPermission.

class SensitiveHash {
  private Hashtable<Integer,String> ht = new Hashtable<Integer,String>();

  public void removeEntry(Object key) {
    check("removeKeyPermission");
    ht.remove(key);
  }

  private void check(String directive) {
    SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();
      if (sm != null) {
        sm.checkSecurityAccess(directive);
      }
  }
}

The SecurityManager.checkSecurityAccess() method determines whether or not the action controlled by the particular permission is allowed or not.

Noncompliant Code Example (check*())

This noncompliant code example uses the SecurityManager.checkRead() method to check whether the file schema.dtd can be read from the file system. The problem with the check*() methods is that lack support for fine-grained access control is not possible, that is, the result of the check can only be black and white. There is no way to enforce that . For example, the check*() methods are inadequate to enforce a policy permitting read access to all files with the dtd extension are allowed to be read whereas access to others is blocked. New code should rarely use and forbidding read access to all other files. Code that is not itself part of the JDK must not override the check*() APIs methods because the default implementations of the Java API libraries already use them these methods to protect sensitive operations.

SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

if (sm != null) {  //check Check ifwhether file canmay be read
  sm.checkRead("/local/schema.dtd");
}

Compliant Solution

...

(checkPermission())

Java SE 1.2 added two methods—Two methods, checkPermission(Permission perm) and checkPermission(Permission perm, Object context), were added to —to the SecurityManager class in J2SE 1. 2. The motivations for this change were manifold:included

• Eliminating the need to hard code names of checks in method names.
• Encapsulating
• The checkPermission() methods eliminated the requirement of hardcoding names of the checks in the method name.
• They used only one copy of the complicated algorithms and code for examining the Java runtime by using in a common single checkPermission() method.
• Newer permissions for resources could be easily added by encapsulating them in a new Permission subclassSupporting introduction of additional permissions by subclassing the Permission class.

The single-argument checkPermission() method uses the context of the currently executing thread environment to perform the checks. If the context has the permissions defined in the local policy file, the check succeeds; otherwise, otherwise a SecurityException is thrown.

This compliant solution shows the single-argument checkPermission() method and allows that checks to see whether the files in the local directory , with that have the dtd extension , to can be read. DTDPermission is a custom permission that enforces this level of access (See guideline SEC10-J. Define custom security permissions for fine grained security for details on creating custom permissions). Even if the java.io.FilePermission is granted to the application with the action "read", DTD files will be are subject to additional access control.

SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

if (sm != null) {  //check Check ifwhether file canmay be read
  DTDPermission perm = new DTDPermission("/local/",  "readDTD");
  sm.checkPermission(perm);
}

Compliant Solution (Multiple Threads)

Occasionally, Sometimes the security check code exists in one context (such as a worker thread) while , whereas the check has to must be conducted on a different context, such as on another thread. The two-argument checkPermission() method is used in this case. It accepts an AccessControlContext instance as the context argument. The effective permissions are not computed as those of the context argument only rather than the intersection of the permissions of the two contexts and consist of the permissions of the context argument only.

Both the single- and double-argument checkPermission() methods defer to the single-argument java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(Permission perm) method. When invoked directly, this method operates only on the current execution context and, as a result, does not supersede the security manager's two-argument version.

A cleaner approach to making a security check from a different context is to take a snapshot of the execution context in which the check must be performed, using the java.security.AccessController.getContext() method that returns an AccessControlContext object. The AccessControlContext class itself defines a checkPermission() method that encapsulates a context instead of accepting the current executing context as a parameteran argument. This approach allows the check to be performed at a later time, as shown belowin the following example.

// Take the snapshot of the required context, store in acc, and pass it to another context
AccessControlContext acc = AccessController.getContext();

// Accept acc in another context and invoke checkPermission() on it
acc.checkPermission(perm);

Risk Assessment

Failing Failure to enforce security checks in code that performs sensitive operations can lead to malicious tampering of sensitive data.

Automated Detection

Identifying sensitive operations requires assistance from the programmer; fully - automated identification of sensitive operations is beyond the current state of the art.

Given knowledge of which operations are sensitive, as well as which specific security checks must be enforced for those operationseach operation, an automated tool could reasonably enforce the invariant that the sensitive operations are invoked only from contexts where the required security checks have been performed.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.

Bibliography

\[[API 2006|AA. Bibliography#API 06]\]

Android Implementation Details

The java.security package exists on Android for compatibility purposes only, and it should not be used.

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedSEC07-J. Classes that derive from a sensitive class or implement a sensitive interface should be declared to be final      02. Platform Security (SEC)      SEC09-J. Do not base security checks on untrusted sources