Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Each guideline has an assigned priority. Priorities are assigned using a metric based on failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) [IEC 60812]. Three values are assigned for each guideline on a scale of 1 to 3 for

  • severity: How serious are the consequences of the guideline being ignored?
    1 = low (denial-of-service attack, abnormal termination)
    2 = medium (data integrity violation, unintentional information disclosure)
    3 = high (run arbitrary code, privilege escalation)
  • likelihood: How likely is it that a flaw introduced by ignoring the guideline could lead to an exploitable vulnerability?
    1 = unlikely
    2 = probable
    3 = likely
  • remediation cost: How expensive is it to comply with the guideline?
    1 = high (manual detection and correction)
    2 = medium (automatic detection and manual correction)
    3 = low (automatic detection and correction)

The three values are then multiplied together for each guideline. This product provides a measure that can be used in prioritizing the application of the guidelines. The products range from 1 to 27. Guidelines with a priority in the range of 1 to 4 are level 3 guidelines, 6 to 9 are level 2, and 12 to 27 are level 1. As a result, it is possible to claim level 1, level 2, or complete compliance (level 3) with a standard by implementing all guidelines in a level, as shown in the following illustration:

The metric is designed primarily for remediation projects. It is assumed that new development efforts will conform with the entire standard.

  • No labels