Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: REM cost reform

Concurrency related vulnerabilities can manifest themselves when assumptions are made about the multithreaded behavior of derived classes. An Overriding thread-safe methods with methods that are unsafe for concurrent use can result in improper synchronization when a client that depends on the thread-safety promised by the parent inadvertently operates on an instance of the subclass. For example, an overridden synchronized method's contract may can be violated if when a subclass defines provides an implementation that is unsafe for concurrent use. Such overriding can easily result in errors that are difficult to diagnose. Consequently, programs must not override thread-safe methods with methods that are unsafe for concurrent use.

The locking strategy of classes designed for inheritance should always be documented. This information can subsequently be used to determine an appropriate locking strategy for subclasses (see LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code and LCK11-J. Avoid client-side locking when using classes that do not commit to their locking strategy).

Noncompliant Code Example (Synchronized Method)

This noncompliant code example defines a overrides the synchronized doSomething() method in the Base class with an unsynchronized method in the Derived class:

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
class Base {
  public synchronized void doSomething() {
    // ...
  }
}

class Derived extends Base {
  @Override public void doSomething() {
    // ...
  }
}

The doSomething() method of the Base class a class called SynchronizedBase. The method can be safely used by many multiple threads. However, if a subclass UnsynchronizedSubclass overrides the method but leaves it unsynchronized, its instance cannot be safely passed to multiple threads. This problem is hard to notice , but instances of the Derived subclass cannot.

This programming error can be difficult to diagnose because threads that accept instances of SynchronizedBase Base can also freely accept instances of its subclasses. Consequently, the threads may incorrectly assume that the subclasses are clients could be unaware that they are operating on a thread-unsafe instance of a subclass of a thread-safe class.

Compliant Solution (Synchronized Method)

This compliant solution synchronizes the doSomething() method of the subclass:

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC#ccccff

public class SynchronizedBaseBase {
  public synchronized void doSomething() {
    // ...	
  }
}
public 
class UnsynchronizedSubclassDerived extends SynchronizedBaseBase {
  @Override public synchronized void doSomething() {
    // ...		
  }
}

This solution also complies with LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code because the accessibility of the class is package-private. Package-private accessibility is permitted when untrusted code cannot infiltrate the package.

Compliant Solution (Private Final Lock Object)

This compliant solution synchronizes the ensures that the Derived class is thread-safe by overriding the synchronized doSomething() method of the subclass Base class with a method that synchronizes on a private final lock object.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public class SynchronizedBaseBase {

  public synchronized void doSomething() {
    // ...	
  }
}

public class SynchronizedSubclassDerived extends SynchronizedBaseBase {
  private final Object lock = new Object();

  @Override public synchronized void doSomething() {
    synchronized (lock) {
      // ...		
    }
  }
}

Exceptions

EX1: If the subclass implements block synchronization instead of method synchronization, it is quite possible that thread-safety has been accounted for. This condition should be sufficiently documented.

Risk Assessment

This is an acceptable solution, provided the locking policy of the Derived class is consistent with that of the Base class.

Noncompliant Code Example (Private Lock)

This noncompliant code example defines a doSomething() method in the Base class that uses a private final lock in accordance with LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code.

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
class Base {
  private final Object lock = new Object();

  public void doSomething() {
    synchronized (lock) {
      // ...
    }
  }
}

class Derived extends Base {
  Logger logger = // Initialize

  @Override public void doSomething() {
    try {
      super.doSomething();
    } finally {
      logger.log(Level.FINE, "Did something");
    }
  }
}

It is possible for multiple threads to cause the entries to be logged in an order that differs from the order in which the tasks are performed. Consequently, the doSomething() method of the Derived class cannot be used safely by multiple threads because it is not thread-safe.

Compliant Solution (Private Lock)

This compliant solution synchronizes the doSomething() method of the subclass using its own private final lock object:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
class Base {
  private final Object lock = new Object();

  public void doSomething() {
    synchronized (lock) {
      // ...
    }
  }
}

class Derived extends Base {
  Logger logger = // Initialize

  private final Object lock = new Object();

  @Override public void doSomething() {
    synchronized (lock) {
      try {
        super.doSomething();
      } finally {
        logger.log(Level.FINE, "Did something");
      }
    }
  }
}

Note that the Base and Derived objects maintain distinct locks that are inaccessible from each other's classes. Consequently, Derived can provide thread-safety guarantees independent of Base.

Risk Assessment

Overriding thread-safe methods with methods that are unsafe for concurrent access Failure to provide synchronization in overriding methods can result in unexpected behavior.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Detectable

Remediation Cost

Repairable

Priority

Level

CON06

TSM00-J

low

Low

Probable

probable

Yes

medium

No

P4

L3

Automated Detection

TODO

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

Wiki Markup
\[[API 06|AA. Java References#API 06]\]
\[[SDN 08|AA. Java References#SDN 08]\] Sun bug database, [Bug ID 4294756|http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4294756]

Sound automated detection is infeasible; heuristic checks could be useful.

ToolVersionCheckerDescription
Parasoft Jtest

Include Page
Parasoft_V
Parasoft_V

CERT.TSM00.OSNSAvoid overriding synchronized methods with non-synchronized methods

Bibliography


...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedCON05-J. Use a unique channel to acquire locks on any file      11. Concurrency (CON)      CON05-J. Do not defer a thread that is holding a lock