You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 45 Next »

Prefer type definitions (typedef) to macro definitions (#define) when encoding types. Type definitions obey scope rules where macro definitions do not. Type definitions can also correctly encode pointer types because they are not implemented as simple textual substitution. In this type definition, for example, the variable p is declared as a constant pointer to char [[Summit 05]]:

typedef char *NTCS;
const NTCS p = &data;

This can be confusing to developers who think that type definitions are implemented using textual substitution. As a result, Dan Saks recommends placing type qualifiers as the rightmost declaration specifier when qualifying types without explicit pointer decorations [[Saks 99]]. While less confusing to some, this practice is not recommended because it is inconsistent with widely accepted practice and potentially misleading to experienced programmers.

Non-Compliant Code Example

In this non-compliant code example, s1 is declared as char *, but s2 is declared as a char, which is probably not the intention of the programmer.

#define cstring char *
cstring s1, s2;

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, both s1 and s2 are declared as char *.

typedef char * cstring;
cstring s1, s2;

Risk Analysis

Recommendation

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

PRE03-A

low

unlikely

low

P3

L3

Automated Detection

The LDRA tool suite V 7.6.0 is able to detect violations of this recommendation.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999]] Section 6.7, "Declarations"
[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772]] "NMP Pre-processor Directives"
[[Saks 99]]
[[Summit 05]] Question 1.13, Question 11.11


PRE02-A. Macro replacement lists should be parenthesized      01. Preprocessor (PRE)       PRE04-A. Do not reuse a standard header file name

  • No labels