
When using binary operators with mixed operand sizes, be aware that some of the narrower operands may be promoted to a wider type, to match the type of the other operand. For example in the expression a == 42
, the field a
which is shorter than an int
will be promoted to an int
before the comparison is carried out.
According to the Java Language Specification Section 4.2.2 Integer Operations,
If an integer operator other than a shift operator has at least one operand of type
long
, then the operation is carried out using 64-bit precision, and the result of the numerical operator is of typelong
. If the other operand is notlong
, it is first widened (§5.1.5) to typelong
by numeric promotion (§5.6). Otherwise, the operation is carried out using 32-bit precision, and the result of the numerical operator is of typeint
. If either operand is not anint
, it is first widened to typeint
by numeric promotion.
The JLS Section 5.6 Numeric Promotions describes numeric promotion as the following:
- If any of the operands is of a reference type, unboxing conversion is performed. Then:
- If either operand is of type double, the other is converted to double.
- Otherwise, if either operand is of type float, the other is converted to float.
- Otherwise, if either operand is of type long, the other is converted to long.
- Otherwise, both operands are converted to type int.
Widening conversions resulting from integer promotions preserve the overall magnitude of the number. However, promotions in which the operands are converted from an int
to a float
or from a long
to a double
may cause unexpected loss of precision (see guideline INT03-J. Avoid casting primitive integer types to floating-point types without range checks for more details).
These conversions can happen with the following operators: multiplicative operators (%, *, /), additive operators (+
, -
), comparison operators (<
, >
, <=
, >=
), equality operators (==
, !=
) and the integer bitwise operators (&
, |
, ^
).
In the following example, a
is promoted to a double
before the +
operator is applied.
int a = some_value; double b = some_other_value; double c = a + b;
As another example, consider:
int a = some_value; char b = some_character; if ((a + b) > 1.1f) { //do something }
Here, b
is first converted to int
so that the +
operator can be applied to operands of the same type. The result of (a+b)
is then converted to a float
, and the comparison operator is finally applied.
Also, see guidelines EXP04-J. Beware of invisible implicit casts when using compound assignment operators and EXP11-J. Be careful of autoboxing when removing elements from a Collection.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the statement big * one
carries out a binary operation. As big
is of type int
and one
is of type float
, big
is promoted to the type float
. This implicit cast results in loss of precision.
class Test{ public static void main(String[] args){ int big = 1999999999; float one = 1.0f; // binary operation, loses precision because of implicit cast System.out.println(big * one); } }
This code outputs 2.0E9 whereas, the expected output is 1.999999999E9.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution uses the double
type instead of float
as a safer means of handling the widening primitive conversion resulting from integer promotion.
class Test{ public static void main(String[] args){ int big = 1999999999; double one = 1.0d; // double instead of float System.out.println(big*one); } }
This produces the expected output of 1.999999999E9. This is the value that is obtained when an int
is assigned (implicitly cast) to a double
.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example shows integer promotion resulting from the use of the bit-wise OR operator. The byte array element is sign extended to 32 bits before it is used as an operand. If it originally contained the value 0xff
, it would contain 0xffffffff
[[Findbugs 2008]].
int result = 0; for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++) result = ((result << 8) | b[i]);
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution continues to use integer promotion, but masks off the upper 24 bits of the byte array element to achieve the intended result.
int result = 0; for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++) result = ((result << 8) | (b[i] & 0xff));
Risk Assessment
Failing to consider integer promotions when dealing with floating point and integer operands can result in loss of precision.
Guideline |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP05-J |
low |
probable |
medium |
P4 |
L3 |
Automated Detection
Automated detection of numeric promotion is straightforward. Determining which promotions may be problematic is infeasible in the general case. A heuristic approach may provide acceptable results.
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.
Bibliography
[[JLS 2005]] Section 4.2.2, "Integer Operations" and Section 5.6
, "Numeric Promotions"
[[Findbugs 2008]] "BIT: Bitwise OR of signed byte value"
EXP04-J. Beware of invisible implicit casts when using compound assignment operators 04. Expressions (EXP) EXP06-J. Use parentheses for precedence of operation