You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 24 Next »

When using binary operators with mixed operand sizes, be aware that some of the narrower operands may be promoted to a wider type, to match the type of the other operand. For example in the expression 'a' == 42, the field 'a' which is shorter than an int will be promoted to an int before the comparison is carried out.

According to [[JLS 05]]:

If an integer operator other than a shift operator has at least one operand of type long, then the operation is carried out using 64-bit precision, and the result of the numerical operator is of type long. If the other operand is not long, it is first widened (§5.1.5) to type long by numeric promotion (§5.6). Otherwise, the operation is carried out using 32-bit precision, and the result of the numerical operator is of type int. If either operand is not an int, it is first widened to type int by numeric promotion.

The Java Language Specification [[JLS 05]] section 5.6 "Numeric Promotions" describes numeric promotion as:

  1. If any of the operands is of a reference type, unboxing conversion is performed. Then:
  2. If either operand is of type double, the other is converted to double.
  3. Otherwise, if either operand is of type float, the other is converted to float.
  4. Otherwise, if either operand is of type long, the other is converted to long.
  5. Otherwise, both operands are converted to type int.

Widening conversions resulting from integer promotions preserve the overall magnitude of the number. However, promotions in which the operands are converted from a numeric type such as an integer to a float or a long to a double, are particularly pernicious (see INT33-J. Do not cast numeric types to wider floating-point types without range checking for more details). These implicit casts can lead to an undesirable loss in precision.

These conversions can happen with the following operators : multiplicative operators (%, *, /), additive operators (+, -), comparison operators (<, >, <=, >=) and equality (==, !=) and the integer bitwise operators (&, |, ^).

In the following example, a is promoted to a double before the + operator is applied.

int a = some_value;
double b = some_other_value;
double c = a + b;

As another example, consider:

int a = some_value;
char b = some_character;

if((a + b) > 1.1f) {
  //do something
}

Here, b is first converted to int so that the + operator can be applied to operands of the same type. The result of (a+b) is then converted to a float, and the comparison operator is finally applied.

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, the statement big * one carries out a binary operation. As big is an int and one is of type float, big is promoted to a float. This implicit case results in loss of precision.

class Test{
  public static void main(String[] args){
    int big = 1999999999;
    float one = 1.0f;
    System.out.println(big*one); // binary operation, loses precision due to implicit cast
    double big_float = big;
    System.out.println(big_float); // double is a wider type, preserves precision
  }
}

The output is:

2.0E9 // loss of precision
1.999999999E9 

Whereas, the expected output is:

1.999999999E9 
1.999999999E9 

Compliant solution

In this case, a double should be used instead of a float for a safe widening primitive conversion caused by integer promotion.

class Test{
  public static void main(String[] args){
    int big = 1999999999;
    double one = 1.0d; // double instead of float
    System.out.println(big*one);
    double big_float = big;
    System.out.println(big_float);
  }
}

The output is as expected :

1.999999999E9
1.999999999E9

Risk assessment

Failing to consider integer promotions while dealing with floating point and integer operands together, can result in loss of precision.

Recommendation

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

EXP08- J

low

probable

medium

P4

L3

References

[[JLS 05]] 4.2.2 "Integer Operations" and 5.6 "Numeric Promotions"

  • No labels