Many file-related security vulnerabilities result from a program accessing an unintended file object because file names are only loosely bound to underlying file objects. File names provide no information regarding the nature of the file object itself. Furthermore, the binding of a file name to a file object is reasserted every time the file name is used in an operation. File descriptors and
FILE pointers are bound to underlying file objects by the operating system. (See FIO03-C. Do not make assumptions about fopen() and file creation.)
Accessing files via file descriptors or
FILE pointers rather than file names provides a greater degree of certainty as to which object is actually acted upon. It is recommended that files be accessed through file descriptors or
FILE pointers where possible.
The following C functions rely solely on file names for file identification:
Use these functions with caution. See FIO10-C. Take care when using the rename() function, and FIO08-C. Take care when calling remove() on an open file.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the file identified by
file_name is opened, processed, closed, and removed. However, it is possible that the file object identified by
file_name in the call to
remove() is not the same file object identified by
file_name in the call to
Not much can be done programmatically to ensure the file removed is the same file that was opened, processed, and closed except to make sure that the file is opened in a secure directory with privileges that would prevent the file from being manipulated by an untrusted user. (See FIO15-C. Ensure that file operations are performed in a secure directory.)
Noncompliant Code Example (POSIX)
In this noncompliant code example, the function
chmod() is called to set the permissions of a file. However, it is not clear whether the file object referred to by
file_name refers to the same object in the call to
fopen() and in the call to
Compliant Solution (POSIX)
This compliant solution uses the POSIX
open() functions [IEEE Std 1003.1:2013]. Using these functions guarantees that the file opened is the same file that is operated on.
Mitigation Strategies (POSIX)
Many file-related race conditions can be eliminated by using
or simply by ensuring the security of the working directory per FIO15-C. Ensure that file operations are performed in a secure directory.
POSIX functions that have no file descriptor counterpart should be used with caution:
Many file-related vulnerabilities, such as time-of-check, time-of-use (TOCTOU) race conditions, can be exploited to cause a program to access an unintended file. Using
FILE pointers or file descriptors to identify files instead of file names reduces the chance of accessing an unintended file. Remediation costs are medium because, although insecure functions can be easily identified, simple drop-in replacements are not always available.
File System Race Condition
A collection of warning classes that report uses of library functions associated with temporary file vulnerabilities (including name issues).
Can detect some violations of this recommendation. In particular, it warns when
|LDRA tool suite|
Don't use chmod(), chown(), chgrp()
|SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard||VOID FIO01-CPP. Be careful using functions that use file names for identification|
|MITRE CWE||CWE-73, External control of file name or path|
CWE-367, Time-of-check, time-of-use race condition
CWE-676, Use of potentially dangerous function
|[Apple Secure Coding Guide]||"Avoiding Race Conditions and Insecure File Operations"|
|[Drepper 2006]||Section 2.2.1 "Identification when Opening"|
|[IEEE Std 1003.1:2013]||XSH, System Interfaces, |
XSH, System Interfaces,
|[Seacord 2013]||Chapter 8, "File I/O"|